Chevy Nova Forum banner

Why is a 68-69 nova subframe slightly different than the 70-72?

32K views 71 replies 24 participants last post by  nreynolds  
#1 ·
why is a 68-69 nova subframe slightly different than the 70-72? the first thing i noticed is the front rail on the drivers side where the radiator support bushing bolts to. on 68-69 there is 3 holes that are the same size , but on the 70-71 there is 2 round holes and 1 oval hole there, howcome? why did GM do that? thanks
 
#7 · (Edited)
If anyone has pics to post please do so(70 up), this will help me a ton, with decoding a car that I had some concerns about.:yes:

I just had a peak at my car and it seems to have the 69 subframe, I had concerns as to whether it was original or not, my car has some 70 part on it, but I don't know which ones truly belong on the car from the factory. The bolt ons may have been swapped out, but the welded parts I know the factory did.

This is a great discovery for original cars.
 
#14 ·
originality..



Taz...if you remove the drivers side bumper bracket...I think?? you will see the assembly stamp date on the front of the subframe nose...there will be a vertical paint inspection mark (orange or yellow) and a date stamp...upside down. Check out the attached photo...hope this helps.

wilma
 

Attachments

#9 ·
Im a machine tool non union pipefitter and piped up robots for some big three auto production weld lines and they always start new projects a year or two pre production so the frames would be stamped and welded in 1970, so its possible, ive done the new 300c, charger, challenger, mustang, f150, caravan and jeep for kuka robot systems and they all make small changes. For example the challenger roof rail is laser welded for 2009 the 2008's are spot welded with a black seal on each side of the roof.:)
 
#31 ·
I got one left Jason.... It is a late 67 built 68 SS car.. Not much left of the rest of the car but I thought the subframe was worth keeping.. It still has the original SS finned drums and original L48 coil springs on it. I have gotten rid of things over the years that I needed later and could have sold or traded but couldn't keep the stuff laying around... I practically gave away a pair of perfect 68 doors a few years ago with tinted green glass in them..


Tommy :)
 
#34 ·
Yeah, the neighbors kids were caught playing in and on the car After I had started pulling parts. The car had sharp edges and I didn't want them around it. Those A pillars could put an eye out.... It is about to be inside for the rest of the disassembly. Sure is alot of work cutting a car up... Lots of double and triple panels to cut through.. That car has a nice subframe. It was never wrecked in the front.

That dust in the bottom corner of the picture is the rest of the car ......


Tommy :)
 
#37 · (Edited)
Here are some picture's of my subframe, 72 A/C car if this helps .


Image



what a nice clear picture showing the oval hole on the front horn on top near where the radiator bushing bolts to. the 68-69 have 3 round holes where as this picture above shows the 2 round holes and one oval hole. anyone know why they did that? was it to run a drain line through it or something?
 
#46 · (Edited)


my car was built Aug 1969

Not to say the sub frame was built then. GM orders parts way in advance. So no telling what line or plant or stock pile it came from. I am pretty sure these were made by GM in GM frame plants. I have no idea where they were then. I do not think they were contract. Kitchener Frame & Oshkosh Frame do build a lot of frames for GM. I have no idea if they did then.

This help??
Al
 
#62 ·
wow, that front rail looks like its been in an accident. it would be interesting to see in the 72 assembly manual if the subframe part number is the same as the 70 part number... i have the 68,69,and 70 assembly manual but not the 71 and 72 so i cant compare the number... if anyone knows the 71 or 72 part number, post it here and i will compare it. it should be in the front section i think under section 3 or 2.... the other intersting thing is that whenever GM made a change to a part whether it be a cosmetic change or a measurement change, they would asign it a new part number. i think not only did they make that round hole oval for 70 and up but they maybe also altered the upper control arm mounting boss holes at a differnet height to give the steering slightly differnt geometory... but that would have to be measured and compared between a 70 frame and a 68 and 69 frame....
 
#50 ·
Also a a lot of changes could have come from the manufacturing process.

Fixtures and holders or alignment pins for Assembly.

I find it hard to believe they had different sub frame with & without a/c.

Also some changes could have come so the same sub frame for the Pontiac Ventura in the same body configure emerged in 1971, Buick Apollo emerged in 1973, same year for the Oldsmobile Omega.

Interestingly, the initials of the four model names spelled out the acronym NOVA (Nova, Omega, Ventura, Apollo).

Al
 
#52 ·
I find it hard to believe they had different sub frame with & without a/c.

Al
Same subframe at one point in the factory, additional operation added to spin form the holes for AC cars.
I have looked at alot of them, one of the odd things I look for along with the 68-69 bumper bracket differences.
Have not seen an original AC frame on non AC car but have seen original non AC frame on AC car. Some areas of country may not have gotten plastic sheild.
 
#56 ·
This is a picture of the AC baffle on one of our members cars. He is the original owner, it's a South Carolina car.

Image



My car is a '72 Georgia car with AC and had the piece at one time. It had 2 screws holding up 2 little busted pieces of plastic. The screws where self tapping with big flat washers and threaded into the 2 holes on the front lip of the sub frame from the bottom.

Image