Visit our sponsor, National Nostalgic Nova
 
Steve's Nova Site is an automotive enthusiast website dedicated to the 1962 - 1979 Chevrolet Nova, Chevy II and Acadian automobiles. We work together to preserve, restore, drive, show, race and provide fellowship for these classic cars. This is one of the best places to find information about parts, rebuilding, restoration and racing. This website is not affiliated with GM, General Motors or Chevrolet in any capacity.


Go Back   Chevy Nova Forum > Body, Chassis and Mechanical > Drivetrain & Performance > Best of Drivetrain & Performance

StevesNovaSite.com is the premier Chevrolet Nova forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.Please Register - It's Free!
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 2nd-April-2005, 09:00 PM   #16
novaguy73

Title: Nova Junior Member
iTrader: (0)
Status: Offline
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: waterloo, ia
Nova(s): 1973 Nova
Posts: 172
re

Lift dosent really matter in this situation. What is your advertised duration?
__________________
73' Nova, 350, Richmond 5 speed, 9" Rear making some changes
Best ET 11.88
Best MPH 116.05
http://s239.photobucket.com/albums/ff152/novaguy73/
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 2nd-April-2005, 09:21 PM   #17
new2novas
 
new2novas's Avatar

Title: Nova Guru
iTrader: (1)
Status: Offline
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: lansdale, PA
Nova(s): 63 custom convertible
Posts: 1,544
chevytalk.com is down until monday morning, but if you go to their performance section there is an awesome link called "understanding dynamic compression" stickied there.

due to the site being down i can also not post the link to pat kelleys awesome compression ratio calculator which a very good description on compression ratios as well as a sweet downloadable calc.
__________________
Shop website: www.myspace.com/agautomotive

My site: www.myspace.com/bizcustoms

Last edited by new2novas; 2nd-April-2005 at 09:24 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd-April-2005, 09:51 PM   #18
ryan63
 
ryan63's Avatar

Title: Nova Senior Member
iTrader: (0)
Status: Offline
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: kalamazoo, mi
Nova(s): gone
Posts: 314
Yeah, lot's of duration will bleed of cylinder pressure enabling a high static compression motor to run on lower octane.
__________________
63 chevy II
406
TH350
4.10's
Best ET: 11.16@119 looking for 10's with a little tuning.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd-April-2005, 09:56 PM   #19
DriveWFO
 
DriveWFO's Avatar

Title: Nova Guru
iTrader: (0)
Status: Offline
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: PA
Nova(s): 74 Nova...R.I.P
Posts: 12,839
Quote:
Originally Posted by ryan63
Yeah, lot's of duration will bleed of cylinder pressure enabling a high static compression motor to run on lower octane.
Duration doesn't "bleed off" cylinder pressure. The cylinder doesn't begin to build pressure until the intake valve closes.
__________________
Don't worship false idles
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd-April-2005, 10:07 PM   #20
ill deuce

Title: Nova Newbie
iTrader: (0)
Status: Offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: atoka TN
Nova(s): 1964 chevy II
Posts: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by DriveWFO
Duration doesn't "bleed off" cylinder pressure. The cylinder doesn't begin to build pressure until the intake valve closes.
it has to do with the overlap,something long duration cams usually have a lot of
__________________
64 chevy II SS,350,sportsman II heads,10.2 comp,292/244-.507 comp cam,eagle rods and crank.3in exhaust.richmond T-10,centerforce clutch,SFCs,moser 12-bolt,presse axles,3.73s,etc.
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th-April-2005, 01:52 AM   #21
new2novas
 
new2novas's Avatar

Title: Nova Guru
iTrader: (1)
Status: Offline
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: lansdale, PA
Nova(s): 63 custom convertible
Posts: 1,544
http://www.chevytalk.org/threads/sho...page/0#1137028

READ THIS!!!!!!!! and all the links provided!

this link is for the calc and description, also in the post, but figured i would link it here for ease of use

http://cochise.uia.net/pkelley2/DynamicCR.html
__________________
Shop website: www.myspace.com/agautomotive

My site: www.myspace.com/bizcustoms
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th-April-2005, 10:06 AM   #22
Mike Goble
 
Mike Goble's Avatar

Title: Nova Guru
iTrader: (0)
Status: Offline
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Fairfield, CA
Posts: 7,713
I just used Pat Kelleys DCR calculator and it has the Durango Deuce DCR at 8.7. We have no problems at all running on 91 octane California fuel.

EA3.0 puts it at about 7.71 with 192# cranking compression.

The RSR Advanced Dynamic Compression Ratio Calculator puts the DCR on the same engine at 9.57:1 with 200.06# of cranking compression.

http://www.rbracing-rsr.com/comprAdvHD.htm
__________________
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th-April-2005, 10:17 AM   #23
Paul Wright
 
Paul Wright's Avatar

Title: Moderator
iTrader: (0)
Status: Offline
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Psychic Hotline
Posts: 6,786
Quote:
Originally Posted by ill deuce
it has to do with the overlap,something long duration cams usually have a lot of
Wrong. It has nothing to do with overlap. Overlap occurs after the power stroke and before the intake stroke. It's 360 degrees away from compression.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ryan63
Yeah, lot's of duration will bleed of cylinder pressure enabling a high static compression motor to run on lower octane.
Wrong. DCR is effected by the intake valve closing. Pressure doesn't begin to build until the valve closes. There is no pressure "bleeding off".

Quote:
Originally Posted by new2novas
http://www.chevytalk.org/threads/sho...page/0#1137028

READ THIS!!!!!!!! and all the links provided!

this link is for the calc and description, also in the post, but figured i would link it here for ease of use

http://cochise.uia.net/pkelley2/DynamicCR.html
The internet has the uncanny ability to disseminate misleading information at the speed of light.
Like Mike has pointed out those online calculators don't figure DCR correctly. If you compare the output of the equations to reality you'll find significant discrepancies..... something that the Chevytalk "experts" haven't figured out. The reason is they don't use the true intake closing and when figuring cranking compression they don't take into account heating from compression.
A stopped clock is right twice a day. Kelley's program is never right.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Wright
Building a small, high rpm engine
with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive...
like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
.

Last edited by Paul Wright; 4th-April-2005 at 10:47 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th-April-2005, 10:58 AM   #24
Bob T
 
Bob T's Avatar

Title: Nova Senior Member
iTrader: (0)
Status: Offline
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 324
I've seen the effect of advancing a cam (intake valve closing earlier) and how it typically raises the cranking compression and the DCR, but doesn't the intake opening point also affect the DCR?

If you start the intake opening point sooner isn't there more time/duration for the gas/air mixture to fill the cylinder, causing the DCR to be higher? I realize this is over simplifying things because of intake/exhaust overlap, rpm and who knows how many other factors to take into consideration, but I would think the intake opening point is also a factor in the actual DCR the engine sees.
__________________
Operator, would you trace this call and tell me where I'm at?
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th-April-2005, 12:15 PM   #25
Paul Wright
 
Paul Wright's Avatar

Title: Moderator
iTrader: (0)
Status: Offline
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Psychic Hotline
Posts: 6,786
That's a good question. The short answer is no.

Here's why:
At cranking speed the cylinder is filled by atmospheric pressure trying to fill the vacuum caused by the decending piston. Opening the valve earlier increases overlap which at low rpm draws exhaust gas into the cylinder. This causes the choppy idle and lowers vacuum which hurts intake velocity...not help it. Below about 3,000 rpm the VE is very poor on typical "Big Cam" engines.

Earlier Intake opening and increased overlap helps once the rpm increases to the point that air inertia can fill the cylinder more effectively. The ram effect can overfill the cylinders (over 100%VE) and is not considered in DCR. In some DCR situations if the VE is over 100% detonation is most likely at the point of peak torque WOT.

Just as a supercharged engine requires a lower static compression ratio to prevent detonation under boost, some normally aspirated engines have to consider what happens when the ram effect "boost" comes in.

So if someone says the acceptable DCR for a certain octane is "X.X" it may only be true for low VE engines. That same DCR would not be acceptable for over 100% VE engines. This is why I prefer monitoring cranking compression as opposed to DCR numbers. If your cranking compression is too high then it's only going to get worse when the ram effect comes in. If your DCR is incorrectly calculated and/or you use the wrong rule of thumb you're asking for trouble.

Now of course someone will ask "what cranking compression is ok for XX octane?"
I hate defining what cranking compression is ok for any octane because of all the variables involved. The combustion chamber shape and material; the air inlet temp, spark advance, rpm and engine load all are factors.

Altitude changes and ambient air pressure can cause an engine to detonate one day and run great on another.

A 10.5:1 350 towing a trailer up a hill is in a much different situation then in a V-8 Vega doing the 1/4 mile.

Generally, a SBC with bathtub heads and 150-160 psi will run on 87 octane. With optimum squish and the right spark advance you can run higher. Anything over 200 psi is scary even on 93.


The closer you get to the detonation edge the more important you have ALL your facts correct. My advice is to choose wisely and don't get greedy. Otherwise it really hurts when your "rule of thumb" gets smashed.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Wright
Building a small, high rpm engine
with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive...
like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
.

Last edited by Paul Wright; 4th-April-2005 at 04:45 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th-April-2005, 01:16 PM   #26
Paul Wright
 
Paul Wright's Avatar

Title: Moderator
iTrader: (0)
Status: Offline
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Psychic Hotline
Posts: 6,786
As soon as everyone is done posting, I'm going to merge the previous posts on this subject and put this into FAQ section.

I've got some additional comments based on stuff I've learned from on this Honda project I'm working on. The big overlap cams that gives the choppy idle and helps the ram effect are very inefficient at low rpm. Unless you have a converter and gears to get the engine into the power band, all you have is a 3 legged dog that's all bark and no bite. If your engine can only turn to 6,000 rpm you have a very narrow powerband. Only useful for short 1/4 mile runs.

I've been very impressed with the specific output of the Honda engine. 125hp per liter normally aspirated, idles smooth and runs on pump gas is fantastic accomplishment.

If a 350 made that kind of power you'd have 712 HP!

Already the smooth idling 500 hp Z06 is redefining what's fast and "cool".
I think you'll see the day soon when a production GM Corvette V-8 has a VTEC like system. Everyone will have to adjust their old school thinking when there's a 5 liter Vette that makes 625hp and still gets 27 mpg!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Wright
Building a small, high rpm engine
with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive...
like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
.

Last edited by Paul Wright; 4th-April-2005 at 01:20 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th-April-2005, 02:07 PM   #27
stock z/28

Title: Nova Guru
iTrader: (0)
Status: Offline
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: lafayette In
Posts: 3,023
Hi Paul,

Just a couple questions.
Whats your opinion of swept volume verses compression gage readings?

Ive seen stock (and I mean untouched) 305s with over 200 psi cranking pressure, that had no detonation problems at all.


And Ive seen 455s with around 155 psi cranking and serious detonation problems.

What are you getting specifically out of the Honda, at what rpm?
If its improper of me to ask, I understand if you dont want to provide details.

Thanks

Jeff
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th-April-2005, 02:54 PM   #28
Bob T
 
Bob T's Avatar

Title: Nova Senior Member
iTrader: (0)
Status: Offline
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 324
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Wright
That's a good question. The short answer is no.

Here's why:
At cranking speed the cylinder is filled by atmospheric pressure trying to fill the vacuum caused by the decending piston. Opening the valve earlier increases overlap which at low rpm draws exhaust gas into the cylinder. This causes the choppy idle and lowers vacuum which hurts intake velocity...not help it. Below about 3,000 rpm the VE is very poor on typical "Big Cam" engines.

Earlier Intake opening and increased overlap helps once the rpm increases to the point that air inertia can fill the cylinder more effectively. The ram effect can overfill the cylinders (over 100%VE) and is not considered in DCR. In some DCR situations if the VE is over 100% detonation is most likely at the point of peak torque WOT.
Paul, I'm closer to understanding but not quite there.
The short answer says no but the detailed answer seems to say yes, the intake opening point does affect the DCR. If I understand you correctly, in this example with a typical "Big Cam" at lower rpm's the earlier intake opening would lower the DCR and at higher rpm's the earlier intake opening would raise the DCR. Correct?

For example if you had a race car that ran fine on a certain octane fuel and you changed only the intake opening point of the cam timing, maybe the cranking compression would be about the same but now when you race the car you discover signs of detonation at high rpm because of the ram effect of the air inertia is increasing the cylinder filling/DCR from the previous cam timing?

Last edited by Bob T; 4th-April-2005 at 03:03 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th-April-2005, 03:28 PM   #29
Paul Wright
 
Paul Wright's Avatar

Title: Moderator
iTrader: (0)
Status: Offline
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Psychic Hotline
Posts: 6,786
Jeff:
My list of variables was by no means complete. Bore and stroke, rod length Quench heads or non quench, etc. Every engine design is different.

I remember an engine builder here that milled the heads on a 460 going into our car hauler ("for a little better torque"). That thing detonated so bad the boss personally wanted to know who built the engine. The compression wasn't that much higher than stock but the 460 was obviously more sensitive to compression than a SBC.

That's why it's impossible to make blanket statements that a certain DCR is ok for a certain octane for every engine. You can make general statements and observe trends and results but you can't flatly state the highest SCR or even DCR an engine won't detonate in all circumstances. I thought I made that clear in my comments about "rules of thumb".


I worked in the Chevy dealership when 305's were new. I worked on many 305 engines but never saw 200 psi. I maybe saw 165 psi maybe 170 if it was carboned up. If you got 200 psi then I'm sure there is an explaination.
If you are cranking until you get the highest reading then you aren't doing it right. It's 4 puffs then stop. I explained why in a previous post.
As a side note on cranking compression, if the engine is in poor condition you'll get misleading readings also. It's very important to understand what influences air pressure readings.

I might add that stock 305's would detonate like crazy if the EGR was deactivated unless you ran 93 octane. The fuel economy savings of blocking off the EGR was offset by the price of fuel. I know this because I tried everything I could think of to increase fuel economy in my 305 during the 78-79 oil embargo.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Wright
Building a small, high rpm engine
with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive...
like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
.

Last edited by Paul Wright; 4th-April-2005 at 03:47 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th-April-2005, 03:54 PM   #30
Paul Wright
 
Paul Wright's Avatar

Title: Moderator
iTrader: (0)
Status: Offline
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Psychic Hotline
Posts: 6,786
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob T
Paul, I'm closer to understanding but not quite there.
The short answer says no but the detailed answer seems to say yes, the intake opening point does affect the DCR. If I understand you correctly, in this example with a typical "Big Cam" at lower rpm's the earlier intake opening would lower the DCR and at higher rpm's the earlier intake opening would raise the DCR. Correct?

For example if you had a race car that ran fine on a certain octane fuel and you changed only the intake opening point of the cam timing, maybe the cranking compression would be about the same but now when you race the car you discover signs of detonation at high rpm because of the ram effect of the air inertia is increasing the cylinder filling/DCR from the previous cam timing?
Bob,

Technically the DCR does not change since it only figures the swept volume when the intake closes not opens. Therfore the DCR value is NOT effected by intake opening.

MEP is Mean Effective Pressure and that is what changes dynamically from VE changes. There's a ton of engineering information on the subject of MEP.Downloadable PDF file 134kb

You are correct that a cam change could have the same DCR but detonate due to increased VE (cylinder filling) increasing MEP past octane tolerance.

Calculated cranking compression is determined by DCR multiplied by atmospheric pressure and adjusted for heating caused by compression.
1st law of thermodynamics

Observed cranking compression is influenced by starter speed, carbon build up, ring and valve seal, timing chain slop and probably a number of other factors.

If my observed deviates from my predicted pressure I'll want to know why.

That's why I test for pressure on the run in stand and keep track of leak down percentages. To be accurate you must keep the # of cranks the same and you must know % leakage.

Let me also add that OEM's use a pressure transducer and a crank angle encoder to measure and plot cylinder pressure vs cylinder volume. This is the best way to determine what's going on but it's very expensive.
Internal combustion engine PV graph animation
I have heard of people using a compression gauge on one cylinder of a running engine to observe IMEP but I'm not sure if this is a valid test since the cylinder is not firing and you can't measure vacuum.

For the average joe in his garage, the cranking pressure test is a low cost tool that if done correctly can give you useful information you otherwise might not have. It's better than scratching your head and guessing, right?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Wright
Building a small, high rpm engine
with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive...
like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
.

Last edited by Paul Wright; 4th-April-2005 at 05:28 PM..
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


Site best viewed set to 1024 x 768.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:15 PM.

Custom Designed for Steve's Nova Site by: vBSkinworks

 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.